🧪 Chemistry Calculator Suite Knowledge Base

Orgel Diagrams for Transition Metal Complexes

By Aniket Bhardwaj · 29 October 2026 · Inorganic

Orgel diagrams are qualitative correlation diagrams that simplify the interpretation of electronic absorption spectra for high-spin transition metal complexes. In examinations like CSIR-NET, GATE, IIT-JAM, and CUET-PG, questions test your ability to predict spin-allowed absorption bands, assign transitions to Mulliken terms, and extract crystal field splitting parameters like 10 Dq. Orgel diagrams offer a direct, reliable approach without requiring complete Tanabe-Sugano matrices.

Fundamental Principles of Orgel Diagrams

Devised by Leslie Orgel, these diagrams show how free-ion Russell-Saunders terms split in octahedral or tetrahedral ligand fields. Because they display only states with the same spin multiplicity as the ground state, Orgel diagrams apply strictly to high-spin complexes. Low-spin complexes require Tanabe-Sugano diagrams.

Every Orgel diagram places the unsplit free-ion term at the centre (zero field: Δ = 0 or 10 Dq = 0). States diverge as field strength increases. Two symmetry rules allow eight d-electron configurations to share two diagrams: Bethe hole formalism and the octahedral-tetrahedral inversion rule.

The D-Term Orgel Diagram (d1, d4, d6, d9)

Configurations d1, d4, d6, and d9 produce D ground terms (2D for d1, d9; 5D for d4, d6). In an octahedral field, d orbitals split into a lower t2g set and an upper eg set. For a d1 ion, the 2D term splits into a lower 2T2g ground state and an upper 2Eg excited state separated by Δo (10 Dq), giving one spin-allowed transition: 2T2g → 2Eg.

Under hole formalism, a subshell lacking n electrons from a half-filled or filled shell behaves like n positive holes with inverted energy levels. An octahedral d9 complex thus has an inverted 2Eg ground state and a 2T2g excited state.

Tetrahedral geometry also inverts splitting (Δt = 4/9 Δo). Combining hole formalism with geometric inversion yields two groups:

Because tetrahedral complexes lack an inversion centre, the 'g' (gerade) subscript is omitted for all tetrahedral terms.

The F-Term Orgel Diagram (d2, d3, d7, d8)

Configurations d2, d3, d7, and d8 give an F ground term (3F for d2, d8; 4F for d3, d7) and an excited P term of identical spin multiplicity (3P for d2, d8; 4P for d3, d7). In cubic symmetry, an F term splits into T1(F), T2(F), and A2(F). The atomic P term does not split; it transforms as T1(P).

Under the non-crossing rule, identical symmetry states repel each other: T1(F) curves downward and T1(P) curves upward.

Key Transition Formulas:
D-term: ΔE = 10 Dq = Δ (Single absorption band)
A2g ground state (d3, d8 octahedral):
Band 1: ν1 = 10 Dq = Δo
Sum rule: ν2 + ν3 = 15 B + 3 ν1
Racah parameter: B = (ν2 + ν3 − 3 ν1) / 15
Variables: ν1, ν2, ν3, 10 Dq, and B are in cm−1.

Worked Examples of Spectral Analysis

Example 1: Hexaaquatitanium(III) Band Assignment

An aqueous solution of [Ti(H2O)6]3+ shows a single absorption band at 20,300 cm−1. Assign this transition, find 10 Dq, and calculate crystal field stabilisation energy (CFSE).

Step 1: Ti(III) is 3d1 with ground term 2D. In an octahedral field, 2D splits into 2T2g and 2Eg. The single transition is 2T2g → 2Eg.

Step 2: Transition energy gives Δo = 10 Dq = 20,300 cm−1.

Step 3: For t2g1 eg0, CFSE = −0.4 × Δo = −0.4 × 20,300 cm−1 = −8,120 cm−1.
Second-route check: CFSE = 1 × (−4 Dq) = −4 × 2,030 cm−1 = −8,120 cm−1.

Example 2: Determining 10 Dq and Racah Parameter B for Nickel(II)

An octahedral [Ni(H2O)6]2+ complex displays three spin-allowed bands at ν1 = 8,500 cm−1, ν2 = 13,800 cm−1, and ν3 = 25,300 cm−1. Determine 10 Dq and Racah parameter B.

Step 1: Ni(II) is 3d8 with a 3A2g ground state. Transitions are ν1 (3A2g → 3T2g), ν2 (3A2g → 3T1g(F)), and ν3 (3A2g → 3T1g(P)).

Step 2: For an A2g ground state, ν1 = 10 Dq directly. Thus, 10 Dq = 8,500 cm−1.

Step 3: Using ν2 + ν3 = 15 B + 3 ν1:
13,800 + 25,300 = 15 B + 3(8,500)
39,100 = 15 B + 25,500
15 B = 39,100 − 25,500 = 13,600 cm−1
B = 13,600 / 15 = 906.67 cm−1.
Second-route check: 15(906.67) + 3(8,500) = 13,600 + 25,500 = 39,100 cm−1.

Example 3: Octahedral vs Tetrahedral Cobalt(II)

Cobalt(II) is a 3d7 ion. Compare the ground states and transitions for octahedral [Co(H2O)6]2+ and tetrahedral [CoCl4]2−.

Step 1: For octahedral Co(II), the ground state is 4T1g(F). Three spin-allowed transitions occur: 4T1g → 4T2g (ν1), 4T1g → 4A2g (ν2), and 4T1g → 4T1g(P) (ν3).

Step 2: For tetrahedral Co(II), geometric inversion gives a 4A2 ground state. The transitions are 4A2 → 4T2 (ν1), 4A2 → 4T1(F) (ν2), and 4A2 → 4T1(P) (ν3).

Step 3: Tetrahedral complexes lack an inversion centre, allowing d-p mixing and relaxing Laporte rules. Thus, [CoCl4]2− has extinction coefficients roughly 100 times larger than octahedral [Co(H2O)6]2+.

Common Mistakes Students Make

  • Using Orgel diagrams for low-spin complexes: Orgel diagrams only apply to high-spin complexes. Low-spin complexes require Tanabe-Sugano diagrams.
  • Adding 'g' subscripts to tetrahedral states: Tetrahedral complexes lack an inversion centre. Use 4A2 and 4T1, never 4A2g or 4T1g.
  • Assuming the P term splits: The atomic P term transforms as a single T1 state in cubic fields and does not split.
  • Confusing transition orders in d2 versus d8: In d8 octahedral complexes, ν1 equals 10 Dq directly. In d2 octahedral complexes, ν1 deviates from 10 Dq due to configuration interaction.

Exam Relevance and Topic Overview

Examination Question Focus Recommended Strategy
CSIR-NET Chemical Sciences Assigning ν1, ν2, ν3 transitions and calculating Racah parameter B. Use the sum rule ν2 + ν3 = 15 B + 3 ν1 for A2g ground terms.
GATE Chemistry Calculating 10 Dq from absorption bands and CFSE calculations. Practice direct extraction of Δo for d1, d9, d3, and d8 complexes in cm−1 units.
IIT-JAM Chemistry Identifying ground terms and predicting spin-allowed absorption peaks. Use D and F diagram pairing rules to quickly classify complexes.
CUET-PG Chemistry Hole formalism applications and comparing spectral intensities. Remember that tetrahedral complexes produce higher absorption intensity than octahedral complexes.
Inorganic Chemistry · CSIR-NET / GATE
Practise Inorganic Chemistry questions

Trends and exceptions are asked every year: practise previous-year CSIR-NET questions and quizzes.

More Inorganic articles