Limits — The Idea Behind lim x→a f(x)
The limit is the first genuinely new idea in calculus, and the one most students skip past. They learn "substitute the value", and it works — until the substitution gives 0/0 and the whole method collapses. This article explains what a limit actually asks, what a one-sided limit is, why a limit can exist where the function has no value at all, and how to handle each indeterminate form with the arithmetic written out in full.
What a limit actually asks
The statement
does not mean "f(a) = L". It means something narrower: as x gets closer and closer to a — from either side, but never equal to a — the value f(x) settles as close as we like to the number L.
The phrase never equal to a is the whole point. A limit deliberately ignores what happens at x = a and looks only at the neighbourhood around it. That single restriction is what lets calculus make sense of expressions like 0/0.
Seeing it in a table of values
Take f(x) = (x² − 4) / (x − 2). At x = 2 the formula gives (4 − 4)/(2 − 2) = 0/0, which is meaningless — so f(2) simply does not exist. Now watch what the nearby values do:
| x | f(x) = (x² − 4)/(x − 2) |
|---|---|
| 1.9 | (3.61 − 4)/(−0.1) = (−0.39)/(−0.1) = 3.9 |
| 1.99 | (3.9601 − 4)/(−0.01) = 3.99 |
| 2 | undefined (0/0) |
| 2.01 | (4.0401 − 4)/(0.01) = 4.01 |
| 2.1 | (4.41 − 4)/(0.1) = 0.41/0.1 = 4.1 |
From both sides the values crowd in on 4, so the limit is 4 even though the function has a hole at x = 2. A limit can exist where the function does not — that is the reason limits were invented.
One-sided limits
Sometimes the two sides disagree. We write them separately:
Right-hand limit (RHL): limx→a⁺ f(x) — approach a from values larger than a
The limit limx→a f(x) exists only if LHL = RHL, and both are finite.
Test it on f(x) = |x − 3| / (x − 3):
- For x > 3, the quantity x − 3 is positive, so |x − 3| = x − 3 and f(x) = 1. Therefore RHL = 1.
- For x < 3, the quantity x − 3 is negative, so |x − 3| = −(x − 3) and f(x) = −1. Therefore LHL = −1.
Since −1 ≠ 1, the limit at x = 3 does not exist. The graph jumps. Any function with a modulus, a greatest-integer part or a piecewise definition must be checked from both sides.
The indeterminate forms
An indeterminate form is a substitution result that carries no information — the answer could be anything until you do more work. These are the seven you will meet:
| Form | Usual method |
|---|---|
| 0 / 0 | Factorise and cancel; or rationalise; or use a standard limit |
| ∞ / ∞ | Divide numerator and denominator by the highest power of x |
| ∞ − ∞ | Combine into a single fraction, or rationalise, then re-check the form |
| 0 × ∞ | Rewrite as a fraction so it becomes 0/0 or ∞/∞ |
| 1∞ | Use the standard result limx→∞ (1 + 1/x)x = e |
| 00 | Take logarithms, evaluate, then exponentiate back |
| ∞0 | Take logarithms, evaluate, then exponentiate back |
Note what is not on the list. A result like 5/0 is not indeterminate — it says the function is blowing up. And 0/5 is simply 0. Only these seven need extra work.
Worked example 1 — the 0/0 form, by factorising
Evaluate limx→3 (x² − 9) / (x² − x − 6).
Step 1 — check the form. Numerator at x = 3: 9 − 9 = 0. Denominator at x = 3: 9 − 3 − 6 = 0. So it is 0/0 — indeterminate, work needed.
Step 2 — factorise both.
x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3)
x² − x − 6 = (x − 3)(x + 2)
Step 3 — cancel (x − 3). This is legal because x ≠ 3 inside the limit — x only approaches 3. Write that line down; examiners look for it.
= limx→3 (x + 3)/(x + 2) = (3 + 3)/(3 + 2) = 6/5 = 1.2
Check at x = 3.001: 0.006001 / 0.005001 = 1.19996 ✔
Worked example 2 — the 0/0 form, by rationalising
Evaluate limx→0 (√(x + 9) − 3) / x.
Step 1 — check the form. At x = 0: (√9 − 3)/0 = (3 − 3)/0 = 0/0.
Step 2 — multiply above and below by the conjugate (√(x + 9) + 3):
numerator becomes (x + 9) − 9 = x, so the expression is
x / [ x (√(x + 9) + 3) ]
Step 3 — cancel x (again valid since x ≠ 0):
= limx→0 1 / (√(x + 9) + 3) = 1/(3 + 3) = 1/6 ≈ 0.1667
Numerical check at x = 0.01: √9.01 = 3.0016662, so (3.0016662 − 3)/0.01 = 0.0016662/0.01 = 0.16662 ✔
Worked example 3 — the ∞/∞ form
Evaluate limx→∞ (3x² + 5x − 2) / (2x² − x + 7).
Step 1 — check the form. Both top and bottom grow without bound: ∞/∞.
Step 2 — divide every term by x² (the highest power present):
= limx→∞ (3 + 5/x − 2/x²) / (2 − 1/x + 7/x²)
Step 3 — as x → ∞ every term with x in the denominator goes to 0:
= (3 + 0 − 0)/(2 − 0 + 0) = 3/2 = 1.5
Numerical check at x = 1000: numerator = 3 000 000 + 5000 − 2 = 3 004 998; denominator = 2 000 000 − 1000 + 7 = 1 999 007; ratio = 1.5033 — already close, and it keeps closing in ✔
Worked example 4 — the standard limit sin x / x
Evaluate limx→0 sin 5x / (3x).
Substituting gives 0/0. Use the standard result limθ→0 (sin θ)/θ = 1, with x in radians. Force the matching angle by multiplying and dividing by 5x:
sin 5x / (3x) = (sin 5x / 5x) × (5x / 3x) = (sin 5x / 5x) × (5/3)
As x → 0, 5x → 0 too, so the first bracket → 1, giving 1 × 5/3 = 5/3 ≈ 1.6667
Numerical check at x = 0.001 rad: sin(0.005) = 0.00499998; 3x = 0.003; ratio = 0.00499998/0.003 = 1.66666 ✔
Standard limits worth memorising
| Limit | Value |
|---|---|
| limx→a (xⁿ − aⁿ)/(x − a) | n an−1 |
| limx→0 (sin x)/x (radians) | 1 |
| limx→0 (tan x)/x (radians) | 1 |
| limx→0 (1 − cos x)/x² | 1/2 |
| limx→0 (ex − 1)/x | 1 |
| limx→0 loge(1 + x)/x | 1 |
| limx→∞ (1 + 1/x)x | e ≈ 2.71828 |
The first entry is worth staring at: with f(x) = xⁿ it is exactly the definition of the derivative at x = a.
Common mistakes that cost marks
- Writing 0/0 = 1 or 0/0 = 0. It is neither. It is a signal that the expression must be simplified first — the answer could be any number, as examples 1 and 2 show (1.2 and 0.1667 both came from 0/0).
- Cancelling without stating the reason. You may cancel (x − 3) only because x ≠ 3 inside a limit. Write it; it carries marks in step-marking schemes.
- Using degrees in trigonometric limits. (sin x)/x → 1 is true only in radians. In degrees, sin(0.1°) = 0.0017453, so the ratio is about 0.01745 — that is π/180.
- Assuming the limit equals f(a). That shortcut (called continuity) works for polynomials, but not at a hole, a jump or an asymptote — check the form first.
- Ignoring one side. For modulus, greatest-integer and piecewise functions, compute LHL and RHL separately and compare them.
- Treating ∞ as a number. You cannot write ∞ − ∞ = 0.
Where limits appear in exams
| Exam / subject | Typical use |
|---|---|
| CBSE/ICSE Class 11 | Limits and Derivatives — algebraic and trigonometric limits, first principles |
| CBSE/ICSE Class 12 | Continuity and differentiability — LHL, RHL and f(a) compared at a point |
| JEE Main & Advanced | Indeterminate forms, expansions, limits of sequences and series |
| Physics and physical chemistry | Instantaneous velocity, and instantaneous rate as the limiting slope of a concentration–time curve |
Check your evaluation instantly. Enter the function and the point x = a, and the Limits tool returns the value the expression approaches — so you can confirm a factorised or rationalised answer before you commit it to your answer sheet.
Open the Limits Calculator →Studying Class 11–12 maths, physics and chemistry side by side? ABC Chemistry runs Class 11–12 coaching at the Gurugram centre plus online classes across India, with home tuition available in the Delhi-NCR area — details at abcchemistry.in.